BAFSA Highlights Concerns Regarding Electrocution Due To Water Fire Extinguishers Or Hose Reels Use In Live Electrical Equipment

15 Jun 2020

Download PDF version

Discussions with architects, developers and others, as well as main contractors when discussing areas of a sprinklered building frequency relate to areas where sprinkler protection can be omitted. One concern often raised with the British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) is the possibility of injury or damage when sprinkler protection is installed in electrical utility rooms.

BS 5306 Part 0 standards

The forthcoming iteration of BS 5306 Part 0 standards contains advice on the interactions between electricity ad fire suppression systems, including hose reels and portable fire extinguishers. The text quotes from an article published in the November 2018 issue of Fire Risk Management, the journal of the Fire Protection Association.

Concerns about the dangers of using water fire extinguishers or hose reels to extinguish fires in live electrical equipment usually relate to the possible risks of electrocution. This theoretical risk (the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have not recorded any such actual injuries) probably originates in tests undertaken by the Paris Fire Brigade in the 1930s and replicated in a piece of demonstration equipment at the Fire Service College.

Omitting sprinkler protection in plant rooms

The conventional approach at the time of publication of BS 5306 was to omit sprinkler protection in plant rooms

Using a 9 liter water extinguisher generating a straight jet could endanger the user, if the jet were to come into contact with a live conductor, as there is the possibility that electricity could be conducted back upstream to the person holding the extinguisher, especially if they are standing on a wet floor.

Because of this risk, the conventional approach at the time of publication of this part of BS 5306 was to omit sprinkler protection in plant rooms and to provide dry powder and/or carbon dioxide portables adjacent to electrical equipment.

Portable fire extinguishers using water mist

Portable fire extinguishers using water mist have been available in the United Kingdom for a number of years now, however, they do not appear to have been widely promoted or deployed in commercial and industrial applications. Apart from their widespread effectiveness, portable fire extinguishers using water mist have a major advantage in that they have a high level of dielectric safety.

A number of manufacturers of portable water mist fire extinguishers on the market in the United Kingdom state that their product has passed a 35 kV test. There have been several instances where fires have started in server rooms and have been extinguished by a single sprinkler head, preventing any fire spread from the room of origin.

BS 5306, the standards for sprinklers and water mist systems

It is normal practice to install inert or chemical gas flooding systems where automatic fire suppression is essential

At the time of publication of this part of BS 5306, the standards for sprinklers and water mist systems allow these to be omitted in areas or rooms where water discharge might present a hazard. For sprinklers, in particular, BS EN 12845:2015, 5.1.3c standards is used based on the systems to be subject to a risk assessment, where their use is proposed in areas where electrical fire or electrocution risks are present.

Where wet systems are clearly unacceptable because of the risk to personal safety or collateral damage to property, it has been normal practice to install inert or chemical gas flooding systems where automatic fire suppression is essential.

Water-based fire suppression equipment

With regard to water-based systems in general, power generation companies make extensive use of water-based fire suppression equipment to protect turbo-alternators, switch gear and transformers at voltages up to 400 kV and involving significant currents (typically 20, 000 MVA).

Provided that such systems are designed and installed in accordance with the appropriate standards, it is expected that they will function as designed to justify omission of coverage in switch rooms, server rooms and transformer chambers.

Risk of electrocution in fire extinguisher use

In an article in the FPA magazine, FRM (November 2017), former BAFSA Secretary General, Stewart Kidd was quoted as stating, “I have long believed that the frequently expressed concerns about ‘mixing water and electricity’ are greatly overstated and usually relate to a theoretical possible risk of electrocution while using a fire extinguisher or hose reel. Much of the fear may relate to the demonstration of the potential for conduction of high voltage at the Fire Service College.”

I can find no records of any actual injuries relating to the use of extinguishers being incurred since 1945"

Stuart adds, “I can find no records of any actual injuries relating to the use of extinguishers being incurred since 1945. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) records confirm that, since 1996 (as far back as its records go), none of the fatal electrocutions recorded relate to fires or firefighting.”

Danger of conventional water extinguishers

The fear of electrocution presumably relates to the use of conventional, 9 liter water extinguishers, which produces a ‘straight jet’. If this was to come into contact with a live conductor, there is, it is agreed, at least a possibility that electricity could be conducted back down the stream to the person holding the extinguisher, especially if they are standing on a wet floor.

As mentioned earlier, there aren’t any examples of this happening and the HSE has confirmed that it is not aware of any such accidents being reported.

That said, do water mist extinguishers that are usually rated as ’safe at 1000v’ (and most are tested to 35kV) pose this hazard, in relation to tackling a fire in live electrical equipment? Is it not time that BS 5306 Part 8 Selection and installation of portable fire extinguishers: Code of practice was updated to reflect the benefits of portable extinguishers using water mist? These are few of the important questions to be answered.

Download PDF version Download PDF version

People mentioned in this article

Stewart Kidd Loss Prevention Consultancy Ltd.

Related companies
Fire Protection Association (UK)
British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association Ltd (BAFSA)
Loss Prevention Consultancy Ltd.
Paris Fire Brigade

View all news from
Fire Protection Association (UK)
British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association Ltd (BAFSA)
Loss Prevention Consultancy Ltd.
Paris Fire Brigade

In case you missed it

How Technology Helps London Fire Brigade With Incident Command

Drones give Incident Commanders an aerial view, increasing their situational awareness of fires and helping them to develop tactics to tackle them. Station Officer Lee Newman details how the technology was implemented by London Fire Brigade and the continued benefits. Identify external risks The Grenfell Tower fire has resulted in revisions to several operational procedures and the introduction of new equipment within the Brigade. A few months after the fire, the Brigade was tasked with setting up a trial to test the feasibility of having a drone capability to identify external risks and assess building stability at incidents, providing essential safety information that could facilitate ongoing internal firefighting operations. Implement the use of drones The Brigade implemented the use of drones and acquired a Matrice 210 V1 and a Phantom 4 Working with partners who had an existing drone capability, as well as drone experts, the Brigade began work to implement the use of drones and acquired a Matrice 210 V1 and a Phantom 4 as a trainer and reserve drone. In the summer of 2018, an Emergency Services bespoke course was run by Essex Police to train the Brigade’s team of drone pilots, who were all PfCO qualified within one week. From start to finish, it took just nine months to get London Fire Brigade’s drone team operational. Working of the drones On its first day of being available for incidents, the team received an order to attend a 15-pump fire at a leisure center, which was under renovation. They were asked to confirm if there were cylinders on the roof of the building and immediately put the drone to use. The team flew and relayed the camera footage onto a large screen that was fitted into a van provided for the trial. The drone footage was able to identify, to the Incident Commander’s satisfaction, that the cylinders were actually rolls of asphalt due to be laid on the roof as part of the renovation. If the drone concept could have proven its use in one job, this was it. The information from the drone allowed the Incident Commander to decide not to make it ‘cylinders confirmed’ and saved a lot of unnecessary extra appliance movements. Applications of drone Since that first callout, the team has been to around 300 incidents of six pumps or more, including persons in the water, fires, and various missing people’s incidents both in London and into other counties, assisting police forces. From start to finish, it took just nine months to get London Fire Brigade’s drone team operational Drone inventory The Brigade’s drone capability inventory includes a Matrice 300 with an H20T dual thermal and optical camera; a DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual with multi attachments; a Mavic Air 2 and a Yuneec 520. The Brigade also has a Teradek live streaming device and multiple tablets for receiving the streamed footage. The Brigade operates with two Mitsubishi Outlander PHEVs – plug-in hybrid SUVs – and has split the drone equipment into two, with one vehicle carrying the drone and batteries, and the other carrying all the support kit and ancillaries. Working in dark conditions The drones are permitted to fly up to 400 ft above ground level or higher in an emergency and can fly as fast as 50 mph. They also can act as a loudspeaker to give instructions or reassurance and shine a bright spotlight in dark or low light conditions. 24/7 service The Brigade has eight pilots trained and operates a 24/7 service The Brigade has eight pilots trained and operates a 24/7 service. The team is working closely with its blue light partners, including the: Metropolitan Police Service, several search and rescue teams, and a host of fire services surrounding the capital, as well as giving advice to other upcoming drone teams around the UK. Use of drone in future The Brigade’s drone capability has been molded to how it sees the future and what it holds in the way of drone use. For example, the Brigade has developed a capability to drop water rescue aides to people at water incidents, which helps to keep them afloat long enough to be rescued. The drone can also be used alongside the swift water rescue teams to provide situational awareness of hazards and the resulting risks during the rescue phase. Delivering fire escape tools The Brigade also invested in fire escape hoods in late 2018 and has already demonstrated how one might be delivered via a drone to a balcony above the height of an aerial appliance while using the Mavic Enterprise 2 to relay instructions via the loudspeakers. These possible new uses are pushing the boundaries of the Brigade’s original concept and demonstrate how London Fire Brigade works to stay ahead of the curve.

Chicago Bans Dogs From Firehouses, Despite Long-Held Tradition

There is a long tradition of canines in the fire service, from Dalmatians riding shotgun in the fire truck to mixed breeds rescued from fires that later become the fire company mascot. The tradition has taken a hit recently in Chicago, where dogs are no longer allowed at firehouses after one station dog killed a smaller breed canine near a firehouse in the Englewood neighborhood. The incident The firehouse dog in Chicago, named Bones, was a mixed breed stray rescued off the street that was living at Engine 116 at 60th Street and Ashland Avenue. A neighbor was walking her smaller breed dog past the firehouse and watched in horror as Bones attacked and killed her small dog. After the incident, Chicago’s Acting Fire Commissioner Annette Nance-Holt issued a department memo: “Any and all prior permissions for dogs in the fire stations or on fire apparatuses are hereby revoked … effective immediately.” Chicago Firehouse dogs Most of Chicago’s firehouse dogs are strays that were picked up and brought to firefighters by the public. Fire crews and paramedics care for the dogs, train them, feed them and get them inoculated and spayed or neutered, then ask formal permission to keep the dogs on site. Historically, permission has been granted, in effect saving the dogs from being euthanized. Breed of choice The tradition of dogs and the fire service goes back centuries, to the 1700s, when carriage dogs first trotted alongside horse-drawn fire carriages. Dalmatians were the breed of choice, given their good temperament, calming effect on the horses Dalmatians were the breed of choice, given their good temperament, calming effect on the horses, and grace under pressure. The Fire Department of New York (FDNY) began utilizing Dalmatians as early as the 1870s. Dalmatians as firehouse ambassadors When motorized vehicles came on the scene, Dalmatians were already associated with firefighters, who continued to keep them on-site as firehouse residents and mascots. Increasingly, Dalmatians and other dogs became public ambassadors for firehouses and were involved in public education about fire safety and emergency preparedness for school and community groups. For example, Sparkles the Fire Safety Dog, a Dalmatian from Clarksville, Ark., was a character in her own set of children’s books about fire safety and traveled around the country teaching children about fire tips. reduce stress, provide comfort Currently, firehouse dogs are other breeds, too, many rescued from house fires or other tragedies. Firehouses often adopt dogs, who become symbols of resiliency, bravery, fortitude – and provide comfort and companionship for firefighters who face high levels of stress on the job. After the 9/11 attacks, two firefighters from Rochester, N.Y., gifted the FDNY Ladder 20 company a Dalmatian puppy, appropriately named Twenty. The dog served as a source of comfort to the firefighters, who lost seven members of the company in 9/11. Dogs recognize signals Taken in as a stray in 1929, a dog named Nip served 10 years with New York’s Engine Company No. 203. During his service, the dog was injured by broken glass, falling debris, scalding burns, and bruises from falling off the fire engine. Nip could recognize all bells and signals. On fire scenes, Nip could alert firefighters if he knew something was wrong and sometimes run into burning buildings to look for victims. Unfortunately, Nip was killed by a hit-and-run driver in front of the firehouse in 1939 (and was stuffed by a taxidermist and displayed at the firehouse until 1974). Dogs promote fire safety Dogs promote fire safety outside the firehouse Dogs also promote fire safety outside the firehouse. For example, accelerant-sniffing dogs are trained to detect minute traces of accelerants that may be used to start a fire, according to the State Farm Arson Dog Program. The special bond between firefighters and dogs is the stuff of legend, despite the recent unfortunate events in Chicago – an ignoble scar on a long, colorful history of dogs in the fire service. Hopes remain that the decision can somehow be reversed, based on social media postings. “This is the first tragedy I have heard of in … 25 years,” said the administrator of the Firehouse Pups group.

What Impact Has COVID-19 Had On The Fire Industry?

The COVID-19 pandemic has had ramifications for almost every industry, some more than others. With the pandemic stretching well into a second year, the non-medical consequences continue, and many are wondering about which of the required changes might become permanent. As regards the fire sector, we asked our Expert Panel Roundtable: What impact has COVID-19 had on the fire industry?