Koorsen Shares Harmful Effects Of Halon Substances And Helps To Replace The Current Halon Fire Suppression System

23 Jul 2020

Download PDF version

Most clean agents used for fire suppression systems are very eco-friendly. However, halon is not. Halon substances, which are still in use in many older systems, have been found to have very high ozone depletion properties.

The use of halon for fire protection systems was first introduced into the market in the mid-1960s and quickly became the industry standard for protecting high value-assets from fire. And, by the 1970s, halon-based systems were one of the most prevalent types of fire suppression systems in the country.

Fire extinguishing system

Halon is a chemical used in clean agent fire extinguishers and clean agent fire suppression systems. A clean agent fire extinguishing system or portable fire extinguisher provides a type of gaseous fire suppression, in which the extinguishing agent is stored in its liquid form.

When halon is expelled and hits the air, it converts to its gas form which is non-conductive, safe for use around humans, and leaves no residue. In 1987, the United States signed the Montreal Protocol – a global agreement to protect the stratospheric ozone layer. And in 1994, the U.S. banned the production of halon under the Clean Air Act. As a result, the fire safety industry began looking for alternatives to the Halon-based compounds used in many clean agent fire suppression systems at that time.

Fire suppression systems

Halon 1301 (also known as bromotrifluoroethane CBrF3)) is more limited in its effectivenesWhile it is still legal to purchase and use recycled halon, eventually, the diminishing supply will require businesses with halon-based fire suppression systems to replace their Halon systems. This presents a dilemma for businesses that still use such systems.

Halon 1211 (also known as BromoChlorodiFluoromethane (CBrClF2) or more simply just “BCF”) is a multipurpose clean agent rated for Class A, B, and C fires. This type of halon is more commonly found in fire extinguishers. Halon 1301 (also known as bromotrifluoroethane CBrF3) is more limited in its effectiveness and is typically used in fixed installations to suppress Class A, B, and C fires. The only source of halon for use in fire protection is recycled halon.

Private sector businesses

The Halon Alternatives Research Corporation (HARC) has coordinated development of an Industry Code of Practice for the best use of recycled halon since 1989. Their Recycling Code of Practice (RCOP) provides basic guidelines for companies engaged in the recycling of halon to promote safe handling, prevent contamination, and minimize emissions.

In a 2002 report, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provided a snapshot of the progress that the industry and the government had made up to that point in replacing halon fire extinguishers and systems with non-ozone-depleting alternatives for fire protection. At that time, very few private sector businesses were replacing their halon systems, and the use of alternatives was generally limited to new applications, such as in a new building or an operation undergoing a complete renovation.

developing strategies and best practices

While the production of halon has been banned, its use in existing systems remains legal

The report also found that portable halon fire extinguishers were still in widespread use and because they require relatively little halon, they were still commonly being recharged as opposed to being replaced. Is one required to replace their Halon system?

The short answer is no. While the production of halon has been banned, its use in existing systems remains legal. In response to the continued use of halon, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has published the Standards and Codes of Practice to Eliminate Dependency on Halons to help the fire protection industry and the businesses they serve better understand the issues posed by halon fire protection systems and develop strategies and best practices for their use.

Halogenated agent systems

According to this guidance, halogenated agent systems should only be used in areas where:

A clean agent is required
Live electrical or electronic circuits exist
People normally are present
Protection is needed for objects or processes highly susceptible to extensive damage or downtime

Essential applications are defined as defined under the Montreal Protocol are those in which:

There is imminent danger to human life where human occupancy is essential, and evacuation is not possible
The continued operation is necessary to protect human life
The installation is essential to a community and to protect critical assets
A loss of critical equipment and/or its operation may have far-reaching consequences
Where no acceptable alternative means of fire protection exists

Purely environmental standpoint

There are a number of important factors to consider in deciding when to replace their halon-based system

Whether the halon system meets the criteria for an essential use or application or not does not mean that one is required to replace it, at least not yet. Eventually, though, the fact is that one will be forced to, not by regulation but simply due to a lack of availability of halon to maintain it. All systems eventually fail, and being proactive in this regard can have a number of benefits.

From a purely environmental standpoint, the answer to that question is ‘yesterday.’ However, businesses that do not consider all the costs versus benefits of their investments do not stay in business for very long. There are a number of important factors to consider in deciding when to replace their halon-based system.

Meeting fire watch regulations

The costs to maintain it is an important one. Due to the finite supply and expense of halon gas, these systems are becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. Basic economics dictates that when supplies decrease while there is still a demand, prices will go higher. So, the cost of halon is only going to continue to increase over time. In addition, if there is an unwanted discharge or a leaky cylinder, one may not be able to get the product needed to bring it back into compliance.

Because Halon systems are no longer manufactured, the parts to maintain them (rebuild kits, special o-rings, etc.) are no longer available by manufacturers, which can cause delays when repairs are needed. Also, manufacturers no longer provide support or flow calculations which can cause issues as newer equipment may not function with older systems. And, there are other costs to be considered, such as those associated with meeting fire watch regulations during whatever amount of time the system is down.

Negative environmental impacts

The answer to that question is not always a simple one and can vary from business to business

The real question that every owner of a halon system needs to ask is whether it makes sense to invest in maintaining an outdated and increasingly costly system on borrowed time or on modern technology – one that will meet their business needs in a more cost-effective way well into the future? The answer to that question is not always a simple one and can vary from business to business based on a number of factors.

These factors can include downtime, lack of confidence from customer base, lost revenue that may not be known until it’s too late, and insurance rates to name a few. There are several good alternatives to halon-based systems on the market, which include 3M™ Novec™ 1230 Fire Protection Fluid – the first product on the market to boast no negative environmental impacts – and inert-gas systems.

Evaluating the potential costs

If one is considering whether to replace the current halon fire suppression system, Koorsen’s expert technicians can help to evaluate the potential costs and benefits of doing so. They can also help to maintain the current system to whatever extent possible while one determines the best way to proceed.

Koorsen Fire & Security can handle all the fire suppression needs. Whether one needs to update their system, expand it, repair it, inspect it, or design and build a whole new system, the fire suppression experts at Koorsen can help.

Download PDF version Download PDF version

Related companies
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Koorsen Fire & Security

View all news from
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Koorsen Fire & Security

In case you missed it

How Technology Helps London Fire Brigade With Incident Command

Drones give Incident Commanders an aerial view, increasing their situational awareness of fires and helping them to develop tactics to tackle them. Station Officer Lee Newman details how the technology was implemented by London Fire Brigade and the continued benefits. Identify external risks The Grenfell Tower fire has resulted in revisions to several operational procedures and the introduction of new equipment within the Brigade. A few months after the fire, the Brigade was tasked with setting up a trial to test the feasibility of having a drone capability to identify external risks and assess building stability at incidents, providing essential safety information that could facilitate ongoing internal firefighting operations. Implement the use of drones The Brigade implemented the use of drones and acquired a Matrice 210 V1 and a Phantom 4 Working with partners who had an existing drone capability, as well as drone experts, the Brigade began work to implement the use of drones and acquired a Matrice 210 V1 and a Phantom 4 as a trainer and reserve drone. In the summer of 2018, an Emergency Services bespoke course was run by Essex Police to train the Brigade’s team of drone pilots, who were all PfCO qualified within one week. From start to finish, it took just nine months to get London Fire Brigade’s drone team operational. Working of the drones On its first day of being available for incidents, the team received an order to attend a 15-pump fire at a leisure center, which was under renovation. They were asked to confirm if there were cylinders on the roof of the building and immediately put the drone to use. The team flew and relayed the camera footage onto a large screen that was fitted into a van provided for the trial. The drone footage was able to identify, to the Incident Commander’s satisfaction, that the cylinders were actually rolls of asphalt due to be laid on the roof as part of the renovation. If the drone concept could have proven its use in one job, this was it. The information from the drone allowed the Incident Commander to decide not to make it ‘cylinders confirmed’ and saved a lot of unnecessary extra appliance movements. Applications of drone Since that first callout, the team has been to around 300 incidents of six pumps or more, including persons in the water, fires, and various missing people’s incidents both in London and into other counties, assisting police forces. From start to finish, it took just nine months to get London Fire Brigade’s drone team operational Drone inventory The Brigade’s drone capability inventory includes a Matrice 300 with an H20T dual thermal and optical camera; a DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual with multi attachments; a Mavic Air 2 and a Yuneec 520. The Brigade also has a Teradek live streaming device and multiple tablets for receiving the streamed footage. The Brigade operates with two Mitsubishi Outlander PHEVs – plug-in hybrid SUVs – and has split the drone equipment into two, with one vehicle carrying the drone and batteries, and the other carrying all the support kit and ancillaries. Working in dark conditions The drones are permitted to fly up to 400 ft above ground level or higher in an emergency and can fly as fast as 50 mph. They also can act as a loudspeaker to give instructions or reassurance and shine a bright spotlight in dark or low light conditions. 24/7 service The Brigade has eight pilots trained and operates a 24/7 service The Brigade has eight pilots trained and operates a 24/7 service. The team is working closely with its blue light partners, including the: Metropolitan Police Service, several search and rescue teams, and a host of fire services surrounding the capital, as well as giving advice to other upcoming drone teams around the UK. Use of drone in future The Brigade’s drone capability has been molded to how it sees the future and what it holds in the way of drone use. For example, the Brigade has developed a capability to drop water rescue aides to people at water incidents, which helps to keep them afloat long enough to be rescued. The drone can also be used alongside the swift water rescue teams to provide situational awareness of hazards and the resulting risks during the rescue phase. Delivering fire escape tools The Brigade also invested in fire escape hoods in late 2018 and has already demonstrated how one might be delivered via a drone to a balcony above the height of an aerial appliance while using the Mavic Enterprise 2 to relay instructions via the loudspeakers. These possible new uses are pushing the boundaries of the Brigade’s original concept and demonstrate how London Fire Brigade works to stay ahead of the curve.

Chicago Bans Dogs From Firehouses, Despite Long-Held Tradition

There is a long tradition of canines in the fire service, from Dalmatians riding shotgun in the fire truck to mixed breeds rescued from fires that later become the fire company mascot. The tradition has taken a hit recently in Chicago, where dogs are no longer allowed at firehouses after one station dog killed a smaller breed canine near a firehouse in the Englewood neighborhood. The incident The firehouse dog in Chicago, named Bones, was a mixed breed stray rescued off the street that was living at Engine 116 at 60th Street and Ashland Avenue. A neighbor was walking her smaller breed dog past the firehouse and watched in horror as Bones attacked and killed her small dog. After the incident, Chicago’s Acting Fire Commissioner Annette Nance-Holt issued a department memo: “Any and all prior permissions for dogs in the fire stations or on fire apparatuses are hereby revoked … effective immediately.” Chicago Firehouse dogs Most of Chicago’s firehouse dogs are strays that were picked up and brought to firefighters by the public. Fire crews and paramedics care for the dogs, train them, feed them and get them inoculated and spayed or neutered, then ask formal permission to keep the dogs on site. Historically, permission has been granted, in effect saving the dogs from being euthanized. Breed of choice The tradition of dogs and the fire service goes back centuries, to the 1700s, when carriage dogs first trotted alongside horse-drawn fire carriages. Dalmatians were the breed of choice, given their good temperament, calming effect on the horses Dalmatians were the breed of choice, given their good temperament, calming effect on the horses, and grace under pressure. The Fire Department of New York (FDNY) began utilizing Dalmatians as early as the 1870s. Dalmatians as firehouse ambassadors When motorized vehicles came on the scene, Dalmatians were already associated with firefighters, who continued to keep them on-site as firehouse residents and mascots. Increasingly, Dalmatians and other dogs became public ambassadors for firehouses and were involved in public education about fire safety and emergency preparedness for school and community groups. For example, Sparkles the Fire Safety Dog, a Dalmatian from Clarksville, Ark., was a character in her own set of children’s books about fire safety and traveled around the country teaching children about fire tips. reduce stress, provide comfort Currently, firehouse dogs are other breeds, too, many rescued from house fires or other tragedies. Firehouses often adopt dogs, who become symbols of resiliency, bravery, fortitude – and provide comfort and companionship for firefighters who face high levels of stress on the job. After the 9/11 attacks, two firefighters from Rochester, N.Y., gifted the FDNY Ladder 20 company a Dalmatian puppy, appropriately named Twenty. The dog served as a source of comfort to the firefighters, who lost seven members of the company in 9/11. Dogs recognize signals Taken in as a stray in 1929, a dog named Nip served 10 years with New York’s Engine Company No. 203. During his service, the dog was injured by broken glass, falling debris, scalding burns, and bruises from falling off the fire engine. Nip could recognize all bells and signals. On fire scenes, Nip could alert firefighters if he knew something was wrong and sometimes run into burning buildings to look for victims. Unfortunately, Nip was killed by a hit-and-run driver in front of the firehouse in 1939 (and was stuffed by a taxidermist and displayed at the firehouse until 1974). Dogs promote fire safety Dogs promote fire safety outside the firehouse Dogs also promote fire safety outside the firehouse. For example, accelerant-sniffing dogs are trained to detect minute traces of accelerants that may be used to start a fire, according to the State Farm Arson Dog Program. The special bond between firefighters and dogs is the stuff of legend, despite the recent unfortunate events in Chicago – an ignoble scar on a long, colorful history of dogs in the fire service. Hopes remain that the decision can somehow be reversed, based on social media postings. “This is the first tragedy I have heard of in … 25 years,” said the administrator of the Firehouse Pups group.

What Impact Has COVID-19 Had On The Fire Industry?

The COVID-19 pandemic has had ramifications for almost every industry, some more than others. With the pandemic stretching well into a second year, the non-medical consequences continue, and many are wondering about which of the required changes might become permanent. As regards the fire sector, we asked our Expert Panel Roundtable: What impact has COVID-19 had on the fire industry?